The Pathfinder Platinum has a standard front seat center airbag, which deploys between the driver and front passenger, protecting them from injuries caused by striking each other in serious side impacts. The CX-90 doesn't offer front seat center airbags.
Both the Pathfinder and the CX-90 have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors, available all wheel drive and around view monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Nissan Pathfinder is safer than the Mazda CX-90:
| Pathfinder |
CX-90 |
|
| Driver |
||
| STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
| Neck Injury Risk |
31% |
37.5% |
| Neck Compression |
53 lbs. |
133 lbs. |
| Leg Forces (l/r) |
156/136 lbs. |
324/335 lbs. |
| Passenger |
||
| STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
| Leg Forces (l/r) |
236/309 lbs. |
253/344 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Nissan Pathfinder is safer than the Mazda CX-90:
| Pathfinder |
CX-90 |
|
| Into Pole |
||
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| HIC |
234 |
410 |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

