For enhanced safety, the front and rear seat shoulder belts of the Ford Fusion have pretensioners to tighten the seatbelts and eliminate dangerous slack in the event of a collision and force limiters to limit the pressure the belts will exert on the passengers. The Chevrolet Impala doesn't offer pretensioners for the rear seat belts.
The Fusion Titanium offers all-wheel drive to maximize traction under poor conditions, especially in ice and snow. The Impala doesn't offer all-wheel drive.
The Fusion's driver alert monitor detects an inattentive driver then sounds a warning and suggests a break. According to the NHTSA, drivers who fall asleep cause about 100,000 crashes and 1500 deaths a year. The Impala doesn't offer a driver alert monitor.
Both the Fusion and the Impala have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front wheel drive, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, daytime running lights, rearview cameras and available rear parking sensors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Ford Fusion is safer than the Chevrolet Impala:
|
|
Fusion |
Impala |
|
|
Driver |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| Neck Compression |
26 lbs. |
30 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
A significantly tougher test than their original offset frontal crash test, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety does 40 MPH small overlap frontal offset crash tests. In this test, where only 25% of the total width of the vehicle is struck, results indicate that the Ford Fusion is safer than the Impala:
|
|
Fusion |
Impala |
| Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
| Restraints |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
| Head Neck Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Head injury index |
86 |
89 |
| Peak Head Forces |
0 G's |
0 G's |
| Chest Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Hip & Thigh Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Hip & Thigh Injury Risk R/L |
0%/0% |
0%/0% |
| Lower Leg Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Tibia index R/L |
.63/.41 |
.68/.32 |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Ford Fusion is safer than the Chevrolet Impala:
|
|
Fusion |
Impala |
|
|
Front Seat |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
| Chest Movement |
.9 inches |
1.3 inches |
|
|
Rear Seat |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| Hip Force |
805 lbs. |
855 lbs. |
|
|
Into Pole |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| HIC |
258 |
315 |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
For its top level performance in all IIHS frontal, side, rear impact and roof-crush tests, and with its optional front crash prevention system, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety grants the Fusion the rating of “Top Pick” for 2017, a rating granted to only 157 vehicles tested by the IIHS. The Impala was not even a “Top Pick” for 2016.
The Ford Fusion has a better fatality history. The Fusion was involved in fatal accidents at a rate 33% lower per vehicle registered than the Impala, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

